> > 2010-07-13 19:52:22, '' 님이 쓰신 글입니다. ↓
■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. You response will be judge on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
| |
|
|
|
In the lecture, the professor casts doubts on the reading passage’s idea that Monte Verde preceded Clovis people. The professor asserts that Clovis people were the first who settled in America.
To begin with, the professor argues that Monte Verde’s cultures were able to remain without using handmade stone tools. According to the reading passages, archeologists have not excavated any stone tools to hunt gigantic animals at the area in Monte Verde. In opposition to this argument, the professor says that Monte Verde people did not need the tools since they relied on plants or small animals but not colossal animals.
On top of that, the professor claims that farming does not necessitate digging the ground deeply. The reading passage describes the place where Monte Verde’s cultures remain has been destroyed by farmers. On the contrary, the professor states that artifacts of their culture are still preserved in the deep ground.
Lastly, the professor rebuts the reading’s point that carbon dating is not a believable method anymore due to the changes in air, by stating that many scientists consent to the reliability of recent researches. The professor points out that more than twenty five test methods were completed apart from the carbon dating. As a result, research assumption verified that the site is the oldest. | |
In the lecture, the professor casts doubts on the reading passage’s idea that Monte Verde preceded Clovis people. The professor asserts that Clovis people were the first who settled in America.
To begin with, the professor argues that Monte Verde’s cultures were able to remain without using handmade stone tools. According to the reading passages, archeologists have not excavated any stone tools to hunt gigantic animals at the area in Monte Verde. In opposition to this argument, the professor says that Monte Verde people did not need the tools since they relied on plants or small animals but not colossal animals.
On top of that, the professor claims that farming does not necessitate digging the ground deeply. The reading passage describes the place where Monte Verde’s cultures remain has been destroyed by farmers. On the contrary, the professor states that artifacts of their culture are still preserved in the deep ground.
Lastly, the professor rebuts the reading’s point that carbon dating is not a believable method anymore due to the changes in air, by stating that many scientists consent to the reliability of recent researches. The professor points out that more than twenty five test methods were completed apart from the carbon dating. As a result, research assumption verified that the site is the oldest.
흠 grammatically 첨삭할부분없네용~^^ 단어수만 조금 늘리면 좋을 것 같아요~