The reading and the lecture both discusses the issues concerning organic foods. The reading passage suggests that there are many advantages to consuming organic foods. However, the professor disagrees, saying that organic foods are not beneficial for many reasons.
The reading and the lecture first discuss the effects of the organic foods on human health. According to the reading, no harmful chemicals are consumed by humans as the organic foods do not contain artificial fertilizers and pesticides and therefore improves human health. The professor, on the other hand, explains that organic farmers use natural pesticides which can be as harmful as the artificial ones, affecting people’s health negatively.
Secondly, the reading and the lecture discuss the issue of environment concerning organic foods. In the reading, the author states that organic farming reduces the amount of chemicals put into the ground, hence, decreasing pollution. The lecturer, however, contradicts this idea, by saying that due to the chemical problem, organic farmers have to prepare more land to grow the crops by cutting down the forests. He says that this will result in a completely different environmental issue.
Lastly, the passage and the lecture discuss the impacts of the organic foods on the small farmers. The reading points out that purchasing organic food will help the small farmers to compete with large corporations. Yet, the professor says that the large corporations are attracted to organic farming, making it difficult for small farmers to compete in the market.
In conclusion, the professor disagrees with the passage which claims that there are many advantages to consuming organic foods. He says that organic farming is less beneficial than the supporters of the movement make it seem.
난생 처음 써보는거구요 ㅠㅠ. 학원도 다닐 수 없는 상황이라 채접 부탁드릴 분이 안계시니까 제발 좀 부탁드립니다...
어디를 더 봐야할까요???? ㅠㅠ 몇점 정도 나올까요?