주제-정부는 모든 종류의 과학연구에 자금을 지원해서는 안되며 실용적인 연구에만 자금을 지원해야한다.
찬성쪽으로 정했구요...... 담 금요일 셤이에요 진짜 급해요~
꼭꼭꼭 읽어주시고 냉정한 코멘트 달아주세요!
저 맨날 열심히 하는거 다들 아시죠~? ^-^
Many people think that the government should invest in every fields of science so that the technologies of the country can develop in every aspect. However, I strongly disagree with this statement, and there are some obvious reasons why the government should only spend money on potential parts. One is that investing in every part isn’t very practical and can be a waste of money. Also, the government should spend the extra money saved improving the public welfare.
To begin with, spending money in every part of science can be a waste of money when the study is not successful. You might say that the government should spend money on different parts of science in order to support the insufficient parts and improve in all the aspects. However, that’s not true, and I think that there is more possibility of failure than success. For example, Thomas Edison, a famous inventor, failed so many times that everyone jeered him. Even one of the greatest scientists of the history failed a lot shows that success does not always happen. Therefore, it would be a great misuse of money if the government were to sponsor every fields of science.
In addition to that, public welfare is a more urgent problem of the world than scientific experiments are. If the government focuses too much on science, there might not be enough funding to improve the public welfare. There are many people in needs everywhere, such as the disabled, orphans, or lower class citizens. Unless everyone in the nation can enjoy sufficient amount of human rights, a country wouldn’t be considered well-developed, no matter how developed technologies it has. I once read an article about a country whose government didn’t care much about poor people of the country, and only cared about diplomatic and scientific developments. And according to the article, the citizens weren’t very happy about it, and everyone, including the governments of other nations, criticized the country’s policy. This shows that solving inner problems of the country is more important than spending all the money on science.
To conclude, sponsoring every part of science can’t always bring satisfactory and successful results. Also, finding solutions to the real problems of the citizens is a more important matter than funding science experiments unless they are very potential. Thus, I think that the government should only invest in potential fields of science, not every one of them.