▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage argues that student evaluations are reliable ways to assess teachers’ competence in the classroom. Therefore, administrators of education can rely on the results of student evaluations to improve educational environment. However, the speaker contradicts the reading passage with opposing views.
To begin with, while the reading passage argues that pupils have an ability to judge and evaluate how teachers by their teaching methods and competence teaching methods and teacher competence and they are in an appropriate position to evaluate them. However, the speaker actually points out that student evaluation is not reliable because it is so easy for them to be biased since they are immature and emotional.
On top of that, the speaker casts doubt on the reading passage that students’ satisfaction for education should be reflected in estimating teachers’ competence because they are a consumer for goods, education. The reason why the speaker is against the reading is because that educational services are totally different from other services like business. So, lecturer (she) maintains that educational services cannot be evaluated in the same way that business services are estimated.
Furthermore, 1. the speaker denies the reading passage that maintains student evaluations enable higher level of education to be higher achieved by saying that the accomplishment of educational level is hardly affected by salaries and rather is affected by other factors like teacher’s personal characteristics.
1. 읽다보니 무슨 말인지 이해가 잘 안됩니다. Reading passage 에서 말하는 내용이 student evaluation enable the level of education to be higher 이고 speaker 가 이 의견에 반대하는 이유는 high level of education can be reached by factors like teacher’s personal characteristics but not by salaries 라는 것인가요? 갑작스런 salary 에 대한 언급은 뜬금없어 보입니다. Reading passage 에서 학생들의 평가가 선생님들의 월급에도 영향을 미친다고 나와있다면 그것까지도 서술해주어야 뒷문장에서 hardly affected by salaries 라고 쓴 문장에서 “아 이래서 대조적이구나~” 라고 느낄 수 있을 것 같습니다. 다시 한 번 내용 정리하시고 써보시면 도움이 될 것 같네요~ ^^
In conclusion, these two examples given by the speaker are proper illustrations to contradict the reading passage that student evaluations is proper in estimating teacher’s competence and teaching method. Therefore, administrators who are engaged in making decision for education should be cautious when accepting the results of student evaluations.
|