There has been an ongoing debate over whether or not learning about the past has value to people.
Many people, perhaps most, are against this stance that people do not need to learn about the past.
However, others may assume that people must be learned about clasics, historic occasions ,figures, etc. I agree with the latter position.
First of all, everything about the past is very important to people who do not have wisdom.
Therefore, people do not have fear when people suffer a difficult accident. They only can apply solution of the past about former accidents. Also, It is evidently shown that historic classes increased by korea government .Korean govenment thinks that students surely should learn wisdom of the past. Many stuents also recognize importance about the past . For this reasons I firmy believe eveythig of past very
crucial.
But, even the assumption above is very plausible, people who disapprove my idea may argue that
larning about the past has no value. They says that it wasts time when they study up about the past.
And, they says that the past is not more valuable than present-day. I totally concede this. Yet, I still an emphasis on my idea because there is one more important matter to consider.
When I study historic, I am 13- year- old, I always feel that a great deal of historic data. Many of the data are considered benefit to people in modern society. Modern sociey mainly happens a variey of acciedents.Historic accidents surely help people to solve many problems. Therefore , modern society's people are willing to reflect wisdom of the past about their problems.
To sum up, though everyone may hold a differnt position on this issue, I am favor of the idea that
people have to learn about everything of the past. So, people can overcome the difficulties.
|