In this set of material, the reading passage and the lecturer deal with working at home. Regarding the issue, the lecturer argues that at the begining it looked good, however according to some examples, the result is not succesful. This contradicts the wirter's claim that the concept of at-home work is appealing between employers and workers.(employees 가 더 이쁠듯)
First, according the lecturer, while working at home, it allows workers to have over break time. This is because no one is able to watch employees who are working hard. Besides it does not help save the time, money about commuting due to the lower productivity. This point refutes the writer's argument that saving places and money brings them better conditions such as conveniency and porductivity.
In addition, the lecturer goes on to say that employees are like to get depressed by decresing human network. Even they have family, workers need social networks. Moreover, without commute to workplaces, they are capable to become mentally unhealthier, by staying at home all the time thus commuting can help them. This casts doubt on the writer's viewpoint that while workers don't spend time on commute, they can put more energy on their tasks. |