The lecture and the reading both discuss whether on-line banking is better than traditional banking.
In the lecture, however, the speaker casts doubt on on-line banking's advantages which is described in the reading.
First, although the reading indicates that on-line banking is efficient way to manage people's asset, the lecturer argues that people will be frustrated when the banking system down accidently. In more particular, on weekends or in the evening, system down cannot be fixed quickly so people might feel inconvinient.
Second, in contrast to the reading that the advantages of on-line banking by saving time, the lecturer insists that people will lose time becouse of on-line banking. Specifically, people should make such as ID, signiture and so on while traditional banking is easy to use.
Third, according to the claim in the reading, on-line banking is safe enough to use. On the other hand, the lecturer maintains that there are several problems like virus and haking bank account in using on-line banking.
To sum up, the lecturer and the author stand on opposite sides of the debate over the using of on-line banking. |