▶ Your Answer :
People often argue that governments should reinforce to get down funding of which area; Arts, Scientific research, and Park and public gardens. Although these are the crucial factor to form the society, I am firmly convinced that funding of parks and public gardens should be down. The reasoning behind this is that this can be recovered fast and that it is less important for the economy to grow up rather than the others.
To begin with, I believe that the park and garden are more flexible than arts and scientific research. What I mean is that it is impossible for the expertise of art and science to catch up the level of progress in other countries when the fund of these in this nation decline during a depression. For example, when Korea was shocked by breaks of the stock market, the delegates decided that they pull down the fund of art. At first, It seemed really work though, it was revealed that the art of Korea could not raise up promptly because of the lack of support of the government. So, the quality of art in Korea is not prestigious now.
Secondly, I think the green place does not play a big part in recovering the economy of the nation. To be more specific, if the government choose to decrease the funding of parks and public gardens, there will be no effect on society enormously. Surely, these kinds of place and work can lead people’s lives to become mentally healthy and relaxed, also can preserve the nature either. However, while the economic disaster is in the nation, it will become less important because the other section such as arts and scientific research can earn a lot of money. Hence, because the governments have a responsibility to regain the moderate environment of the economy, they should make a decision to make the economy improve hastily, which render the citizen to live a better life.
To conclude, I highly think that the fund of parks and public gardens should be declined by the governments because of the reasons above. |