▶ Your Answer :
As for the assertion to the reading, the
lecturer argues that it is not convincing. This contradicts the reading
passage's statement that there are several theories about the cause of the odd
sounds.
To begin with, according to the lecture, a
suggestion that strange noises were made by ocra is higly unlikely. The
submarines picked the noises deep in the water, but ocra whales lived near the
surface of the water. Therefore, it would be impossible for submarines to
detect the noises. Furthermore, if it were true, the ocra should be detected by sonar. The argument strongly
rebuts the reading passage's claim that the noises were the calls of male and
female ocra.
The second point of difference is regarding
the giant squid. The lecturer asserts that the submarine detected the noises in
1960 first. However, the noises disappeared in 1980, although there were always
giant squids. There are no reasons for
submarines to stop hearing the noises just after two decades.
Finally, the lecturer argues that the theory about military
technology does not hold up. Actually, the noises changed its direction very
quickly. Furthermore, if there were other country's submarines, there should be engines noise. It is still impossible to
develop the submarines which can change the
direction that quickly and that silent engines now. In opposition to this
claim, the reading passage contends that the submarines picked up the sounds
from other weapon system.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이는 리딩에 대한 부분을 한 문장만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |