In this set of materials, both the reading and the lecture deal with self-employed self-employment. Regarding this issue, the lecturer argues that running their own business is not a better alternative. This contradicts the writer's claim that there are clear reasons people prefer to run running their own business.
First, according to the lecturer, stifling corporate culture is not a the appropriate reason for people to leave their company. Although they wish to run their own business, there are lots of thing to handle with such as regulations or authorities-related things. This point refutes the writer's argument that running their own business can be a better option to avoid stifling corporate work like chain of command.
Moreover, the lecturer goes on to say that running their own businesses may not guarantee job securities. Rather, beginning self-employed self-employment has a high risk compared with working for a company. This counters the reading passage's viewpoint that people tend to run their own business because of low job security.
Lastly, the lecturer mentions that extra benefits are still attractive for workers. Even if it is a fact that companies are now curtailing worker's benefits, these are sufficient incentives that may attract people to companies. This casts doubt on the writer's claim that lessoned benefits deter people from working for corporate is a distorted argument. 서로 반대가 아니고 같은 의견인데 .. 하나를 잘못쓰신거 같아요 :) |