I agree that city should try to preserve its old, historic building rather than destroy them and replace them with modern buildings. Some people may mention that modern buildings in city make the appearance of city more beautiful. However, the city utilizes old, historic places as a good sightseeing source. Also, the city provides their children who lived the city with a good educational environment.
First of all, the city could utilize old, historic places as a good sightseeing source. Some citizen may say that it is difficult to develop historic places. However, old and historic places itself could exist a meaningful sightseeing source. For example, the Insa-dong street which had a Korean traditional life style could be itself a sightseeing place. Foreign visitors could easily find the place because the place was located in Seoul.
Second, the city can provide their children who lived the city with a good educational environment. Some people may say that it is little effect that students learn by seeing the old, historical sites. However, a city which has old, historic places has various benefits. Among these benefits, the places help students to understand easily historical facts. In fact, many students who study in the school are difficulty memorizing historical facts. Also history teachers had a hard time teaching students with only books. However, if some old, historic places exist near the school, they can visit the place and directly see the historical places. Naturally, teachers and students both will satisfy by seeing the historical places rather than just studying through books.
In conclusion, I agree that city should try to preserve its old, historic building rather than destroy them and replace them with modern buildings. It is because the city could utilize old, historic places as a good sightseeing source. Also the city can provide their children who lived the city with a good educational environment.
|