The reading passage contends that wind farms have negative effects on both human and animal. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points which contradict this argument.
First, the speaker argues that the number of birds killed by wind farms is trivial. On the other hand, it provides environment-friendly way to generate energy which save more animals. What is more, red light is not attracting birds but warning them. This casts doubt on the reading, which states that a variety of birds are killed by wind farm, being induced by warning light.
Also, according to the lecturer, wind generators are quiet and it shows beautiful scenery with surroundings. It can be achieved by large blade from progressed technology which makes no serious noise. This rebuffs the reading passage's assertion that many people are complaining about it's noise and sight pollution.
Final point made in the lecture is that wind farms have a positive influence on economy. One significant reason is that wind farms can be situated anywhere if there are some degree of wind because of enlarged and improved instrument. What is more, it earns a huge amount of benefits to the extend to offset all cost of building. This refutes the reading passage's argument that wind generators are not cost-effective since their confinement related place makes it difficult to develop large facilities easily.
근데 템플릿쓰면 불이익 있나요 ㅠㅠ