▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author’s
claim that T.rex is a scavenger. However, the professor in the lecture gives
several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point.
First, the professor contends that T.rex had optimal teeth for
biting other animals. They not only had dull and wide teeth, but they also got
sharp-shaped teeth on side of their mouth. This implies they could bite or
sever their prey. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that T.rex
had the teeth of a scavenger.
Next, the professor insists that they had a brain structure of
predator. Since their brain contained typical portion that enabled strong
senses of smell, they could used the ability to find their food or fight with
others. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that their ability of
acute smelling implies that they were scavenger.
Finally, the professor argues that they had optimal eyes for
capturing prey which implies they were predator. This is due to the fact that
their eyes’ direction helped them to see the same object with their two eyes,
respectively. This structure of eyes was thought to be beneficial for finding
other preys efficiently. This refutes the reading passage’s suggestion that
they had optimal eyes indicating they are scavenger.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이는 리딩에 대한 부분을 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |