It was a good rule that people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Some people may say smoking was a kind of individual right, and stopping smoking was beyond civil`s rights. However, smoking in the public places aroused adverse effects other people. Also If governments will ban the smoking in the public places, they can reduce public welfare fees.
First of all, smoking in the public places aroused adverse effects other people. Public place was built to provide all people with convenience. In other words, It should pursue every people`s benefits. However, If some people smoke in some places, it caused an adverse effect to other people. When I was in a college, one of my friends smoked in the public library. As soon as he smoked in the reference room, A woman who sat next to him started cough. Also I started having headache that he smoked a few minutes later. The acting led to adverse effect to the woman and me. For those reasons, it was not a good act that people smoked in the public places.
Second, if governments will ban the smoking in the public places, they can reduce public welfare fees. Governments spent a lot of money on paying public welfare fees. If people will keep on stopping smoking in the public places, government can spend the money more useful. For example, the government spent more money to support disabling people with the money which was scheduled to preventing smoking in the public places.
In conclusion, It was a good policy that people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. First, smoking in the public places could negative effects to other people. Second, if governments will ban the smoking in the public places, public welfare fees can be more useful. |