| ||
| ||
The reading passage contends that work-at-home system is beneficial to both employers and employees. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points which contradict this argument. First, the speaker argues that workers are more likely to have an excessive break time because there are no proctors, which cause the decrease in productivity. As a result, companies go through waste of time and money. What is more, the amount of saving from real estate’s cannot offset the loss from reduced productivity. This casts doubts on the reading, which states that employers can economize their finance, diminishing the cost of office space as well as increasing the productivity. The other main point made in the lecture is that employers tend to be depressed by working at their homes. This is because they don't have any human interactions with their co-workers. In addition, the absence of separation between personal life and working has a negative effect on their productivity. This refutes the reading passage's assertion that workers can be more satisfied with their life by working at their comfortable homes where they can enjoy their personal activities and don't have to be offended by commute time. 첨삭할께 별루 없네요~ㅎ |