> > 2010-07-07 08:40:42, '' 님이 쓰신 글입니다. ↓
■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. You response will be judge on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
| |
|
|
|
While the author of the reading passage argues that wind power has more negative effects than positive ones, the lecturer opposes the reading's assertion with counter views.
First of all, according to the reading, wind power is economically less valuable because it is unpredictable and intermittent enegy source. One the contrary, the lecturer mentions that recent technologies can compliment this problem. The speaker also states that by using other forms of renewable sources like sun with wind power, short coming of wind power can be solved.
Additionally, the reading passage then points out that it's uneconomical because it costs a lot to generate electricity by wind turbines. The professor, however, counters by stating that wind power is reasonable. She adds that this is because it is pollution free and people can get electricity with no payment, so anyone who wants electricity can get it when they want.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that it can be a harm to ecosystem because it can cause mass destruction of bird population with its turbine blades. The speaker, on the other hand, insists that this problem can be solved with effort to make a new design of wind turbine. According to her, by making these machines less taller, we can keep birds away from blades.
In summary, the lecture suspected the suggestion of the reading that wind power is not beneficial for our lives. | |
While the author of the reading passage argues that wind power has more negative effects than positive ones, the lecturer opposes the reading's assertion with counter views.
First of all, according to the reading, wind power is economically less valuable because it is unpredictable and intermittent enegy energy source. One On the contrary, the lecturer mentions that recent technologies can compliment this problem. The speaker also states that by using other forms of renewable sources like sun with wind power, short coming of wind power can be solved.
Additionally, the reading passage then points out that it's uneconomical because it costs a lot to generate electricity by wind turbines. The professor, however, counters by stating that wind power is reasonable. She adds that this is because it is pollution free and people can get electricity without no payment, so anyone who wants electricity can get it when they want.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that it can cause be a harm to the ecosystem because it can cause mass destruction of bird population with its turbine blades. The speaker, on the other hand, insists that this problem can be solved with an effort to make a new design of wind turbine. According to her, by making these machines less taller shorter, we can keep birds away from blades.
In summary, the lecture suspected the suggestion of the reading that wind power is not beneficial for our lives.