▶ Your Answer : In the given set of materials, there is some discrepancy between the view of the professor and the author over the issue of multinational coporation. The professor raises objections to the benefits of the multinationals presented in the passage.
First and foremost, the professor debunks the author’s conjecture that the reduction of product costs since brands might retain products’ price due to it is related to their brand’s name value. Therefore, they cannot saving their costs owing to the other extremes. This is in direct opposition to the author’s assertion that companies can saving their costs because of inclined output. On the top of that, the professor insists that multinational companies make products resemble each other. It results in homogenization, people might have to buy a same thing. This counters the author’s claim that multinationals enable people to oppotunity to choose a diversity of materials due to their world-wide reach. Finally, the professor goes on expound to the author’s point on local economies is flawed. To elaborate in detail, due to the improving of local workers’ living condition, locals will be destroyed. Local companies might suffer from lack of populations and have a difficulty for hire employees. Finally locals will wipe out by the pressure of the multinational corporation. However, the author argues that multinationals might help local economies remain stable.
Therefore, with these three cogent explanations the professor posits, the author’s assertions are all rendered invalid.
|