It is controversial nowadays whether the government should participate in congested roads problems to reduce drivers' dissatisfaction. In this regard, I believe that the regulation for drivers to pay more money mandatory has more positive effects because this enables people to save time and energy and facilitates government operations. for the following two subsequent reasons.
To begin with, inducing people to feel reluctant to drive more often makes it more possible to cope with traffic jam issues. To be specific, the less vehicles are in the roads during rush hours, the less commuters can be stressful become stressful. Or think of a less dire scenario. If a worker live far off the workplace lives far away from workplace, he should wake up much earlier because traffic jams lengthen the time to commute. However, posing taxation threat to other workers in order to threat other workers, they turn to the public transportation method, so he can be under less burden of lacking time. Therefore, he can come from home to their workplaces on time without being hurry.
Moreover, congregated taxes by this policy can be useful source of other investments. In other words, it encourages more facilities for traffic systems and thus users can enjoy a share in its advantage again (이유에 대하여서 좀 더 구체적인 설명을 하시고 난 후에 예시로 넘어가시길 바랍니다). For instance, Seoul regulates certain time for tax collecting or gathering, so more helpful transportation systems can be applied to citizens without the hassle of fund insufficiency. For drivers, Seoul may provide a lot of electricity stations for free or censored streetlamps using IoT technology. It is same for users who do not ride their own cars. This city is famous for convenient and easily accessible subway, going every corner of districts and being compatible with railroad or airport services. Thus, controlling time and collecting taxes for punishment is not threatening does not threat commuters' freedom, but putting them at ease because the government re-invests to traffic services and use the money for the public.
To sum up, I strongly argue that the government should pose a taxation threat to people for reducing to reduce traffic jam issues for the following reasons I mentioned above: more commuters get little stressed out and collecting taxes can be a fundamental base for better outputs.
점수: 26
약간의 문법적 오류와 불필요한 문장들 이외에는 전체적으로 내용 면에 있어서 아주 논리정연하게 서술된 독립형 에세이입니다. 독립형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 설득력 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 각 단락의 구체적인 설명과 적절한 예시를 통하여서 왜 정부가 교통 혼잡을 막기 위해서 세금을 걷어야 하는지를 구체적이고 명확하게 잘 설명해주는 거 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다.