■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
첨삭 너무 감사히 잘 받고 있습니다.매번 지적나오는 철자, 부족한 논리에 대해서 신경쓰려고
하고 있으며, 여유있게 쓰고 나서 검토하려고 노력하고 있습니다.
항상 감사드립니다.
According to the reading, there is ample support to the author's point that there are contributors to affect effect global warming. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal for the author's claim.
First, the professor insists that there is no supporting supported evidence that methane gas is one of the contributors to the rise in global temperatures. She mentioned that only 9 percent of greenhouse green house gases is are methane gas and it is too low to affect, so it is impossible that methane becomes become to contributors of to global warming. This cast doubts on the reading passage's claim that organic waste buried in landfills breaks down and produces methane then methane prevents some of earth's heat from escaping into space.
Next, the professor contends that the carbon cycle is not matched match with what we know. If a tree dies naturally, it releases carbon dioxide that it has before dying. Consequently, carbon dioxide is absorbed and emitted continuously. This counters the reading passage's assertion that carbon dioxide increases in the atmosphere when many trees are cut down by humans and it causes temperatures around the globe to rise.
Finally, the professor argues that the Medieval Warm Period was not world-wide. What it means that the temperature in the north hemisphere was warm but other religions were cooler, so the average temperature was lower than they expected. Something else would have affected the Medieval Warm Period. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that the current warming trend is related to a naturally occurring cycle of climate change.
관사 및 문법 오류와 관용 표현 사용에 유의해주세요.
수고하셨습니다 :)