The reading passage and the lecture are both about the woman pictured in the portraits. The reading passage contends that the woman is Lady Jane Gray. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes the reading passage's idea by bringing up three specific reasons.
First, the lecturer argues that the number in the portraits is not seventeen, but eighteen. In addition, she came to a queen when she was sixteen and as a result, there are two years differences between the numbers. This goes against the reading passage's point that the number inscription of the portraits represents the age she was crowned queen.
Second, the lecturer points out that the jewel she is wearing in the picture was common in wealthy women at that time so that it is not clear that the jewel belonged to Jane even though it was in her inventory list. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that the jewel including a face made of agate is Jane's collection so that the woman in the picture indicates her.
The final point made by the lecturer is that the symbols do not mean the woman is Jane. This is because the symbol is not wall flower but another flower. In addition, there is no one to use the symbol of brother in law. This rebuts the reading passage's opinion that the botanical symbols in the picture show that the woman in the portraits is Jane because the symbols is her husband's and brother in law's symbols.
우선 어휘의 선정은 조금 한정적이였던 거 같습니다.
조금 더 다양한 숙어나 표현, 연결사가 사용되었다면 주장 전달에 훨씬 용이했을 것입니다.
전체적인 reading/listening간의 비교는 아주 좋은 편입니다.
하지만 조금 더 자세하게 서술할 수 있었다면 ( include more contents) 좋았을 것입니다