▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample
support for the author's claim that there are three methods regarding carbon sequestration. However, professor in the
lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point.
First, the professor contends that the
method of using phytoplankton will not be utilized permanently. When the amount
of phytoplankton increases (주어 동사 불일치), they will require a lot of nitrogen to survive.
Thus, they will be decreased because of the lack of nitrogen. Also, they cannot
reduce the amount of carbon dioxide up to 3%. This casts doubt on the reading
passage's claim that multiplying the number of phytoplankton by adding iron to
the water can be useful.
Next, the professor insists that artificial
wetland is not as useful as natural one. Artificial wetland is not same as natural
swamp, so its efficiency of reducing carbon dioxide is 23% which is less than the
natural one. In addition, artificial swamp needs a (관사 필요합니다) long time to develop fully.
This counters the reading passage's assertion that artificial wetland can
lessen the processes of decomposing oxygen.
Finally, the professor argues that carbon
dioxide which is in coal mine will be leached into the atmosphere. This is because that when carbon dioxide makes a bond with
coal, it generates (시제 -> 현제 시제) methane which is used by an energy source. However, since
methane has carbon in it, using methane as
energy source will make carbon dioxide reproduce and spread into the
atmosphere. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that carbon dioxide
can be stored in coal mines for years because carbon dioxide attaches to the coal.
|
| 1. 각 문단 시작 전에 tab 버튼 눌러서 들여쓰기 해주세요.
| 2. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
| 비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는 되어야 합니다.
| 이는 리딩에 대한 디테일 부족으로 이어지며, 분량 부족, 추가 설명 실패 등으로 이어질 수 있으니
| 리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
| 3. introduction의 분량을 3문장 이상으로 늘려주세요.
수고하셨습니다. *^^* |