▶ Your Answer : When student consider studying subjects, they should think of (전치사 필요합니다) many factors such as if the field is related to significant job growth rate, and how interested they are in the field. and the field is interesting. Directly connected to this, the given statement argues that students should weigh more on the job growth rate, rather than student's interest. Regarding this opinion, I would have to say that I disagree with the given statement. First, nowadays society is complicated and fast-paced, so future is more and more unpredictable. (새로운 문장으로 시작해주세요.) So it is hard to predict which subject is related to significant job growth in the future. Even if a certain subject shows high job growth rate, that does not guarantee that that tendency will last. By the time the student would graduate, that tendency might be changed. Second, we study for knowledge and to live a good life, rather than just be hired by company, and earn money. We attend to school to learn. For example, philosophy, whose job growth rate is miserable, teaches (주어 동사 불일치) students how to live a life, and foster ability to think and criticize. Given this point, people would hardly dispute that student should not take a philosophy class. There are more valuable virtues when studying (분사구문 형태) certain subject, rather than just get a job. To sum up, for these two reasons (단수/복수), I do not agree with the given statement. Never should we forget that this issue might have far-reaching ramifications.
|