■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
▶ Topic : the emerald ash borer (해커스 인터미디엇 교재 3rd edition 연습 01번 : 156 페이지)
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends three methods that can remove the emerald ash borers. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that make a counterargument to the reading.
First of all, the reading passage suggested removing the affected trees. This way hinders the emerald ash borers from spreading out to the healthy trees. However, the speaker in the lecture refutes this reading's asssetion because it is not effective. Whili it would have an effect in unban area, it is not in the forest because there are too many trees.
Next, according to the reading, a chemical treatment is another option. By being absorbed to the soil, the chemicals prevent the adult borers from laying their eggs. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubts on this reason of the reading passage because it has highly problematic. The chemicals go to the soil, so that the ground water will be polluted.
The final point made by the reading is biological pest control. The parasitic wasps might use to reduce the number of borers. On the contrary, in the lecture, it is accentuated that this biological control has a number of issues. The wasp's survival depends on the region such as climate. Also, this method can cause unintended consequences like killing other insects, not the emerald ash borers. |
|
* 질문이 있습니다. 보통 강의에서는 주장별로 강의 내용을 충실히 쓴 다음 리딩 문장을 간단히 요약하라고 하는데요,
이곳 게시판의 첨삭에서는 그렇게 쓰면 통상 리딩 내용이 부족하다고 평가하시는 것 같습니다.
무엇이 결정적인 차이인지 궁금합니다.