▶ Your Answer : The author of the reading passage maintains that the new method which scanning to scan brain is more accurate than the conventional one. However, the professor of the lecture thinks that it is not more reliable than the former ones.
First of all, the writer of the reading passage states that a true statement cannot be misjudged as lies. Contrary to the conventional one which detects lies based on the person’s anxiety, the new one distinguishes it according to the increasing and decreasing activities of the specific brain part, so this level of the premise cannot affect the judgement. However, the professor of the lecture reputes refutes this argument as it can misjudge the honest one. According to her statement, brain uses the same parts when storing the information and lying on others.
Furthermore, an innocent suspect can be pointed out as a criminal when they are asked some embarrassing questions due to the human tendency that they want to avoid question they do not want to answer. Since people have blur memories and choose what can they reveal as an answer or not, it can be also be misjudged as a lie.
She also asserts that the new way to distinguish the false and true statement can be misjudged by expert’s bias. The author of the reading passage postulates that this new way prevents conductors to misjudge because it shows suspect’s brain activity in a picture. In spite of that, she pointed out that this picture does not shows clear conclusions since the brain uses various sector for one propose. It means that experts are still needed to analyze the picture, so odds of misjudging still exists are still existing.
For the last, she condemns that this new method is still easier to trick. In the reading passage, the author of the lecture maintains that there is less or no chances to misunderstood misunderstand since the way which used to pool the old way does not work on the new one. However, the lecturer of the listening passage pointed out that there are several ways to trick the test. For example, the suspect pools the test by solving a complex mathematical problem or listening to the statement that is not true. This makes brain confused so that the test could not distinguish the truth of false statement.
예상 점수: 17-21 총평: 우선 인트로에서 idiom과 관련된 문제가 있습니다. 두번째로 첫문단에서 하이라이트된 부분은 run-on-sentence로 한문장에 두개의 내용이 들어 있어서 끊어서 쓰실 필요가 있는 문장입니다. 또한 repute가 아닌 refute로 단어를 맞춰서 써주시는게 좋을 것 같아요. 마지막으로는 시제와 관련된 문제가 있는 단순한 상황을 얘기할 때는 현재 시제를 사용해주시는게 좋고, 또 가정을 하실때도 현재형 시제를 써주시는 게 맞습니다. 마지막으로는 접속사로 두 절을 연결해주실 때는 두 절이 형태가 동일해야 합니다. 수고 많으셨습니다. |