▶ Your Answer :
According
to the reading, there is ample support for the author's claim that carbon
sequestration that involves storing greenhouse
gases in the ground and oceans can be conducted by three methods. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several
points that contradict this argument. to contradict this argument.
First, the
professor contends that increasing the amount of phytoplankton by dumping iron
to the oceans is not effective. They also need nitrogen to live, so adding only
iron is not permanent resolution. Also, a study shows that despite dumping
plenty of iron, it leads reducing only small amount of CO2. This casts doubt on
the reading passage's suggestion that adding iron-rich dust allows
phytoplankton to grow, which would increase the amount of CO2 stored in the
oceans.
Next, the
professor insists that artificial wetlands cannot function
as well as natural one. This means they They (this means는 적절하지 않는 표현 입니다) do not well prevent decomposition and cannot
decrease the amount of CO2. In addition, it takes too long time for artificial
swamp to fully develop. This refutes the reading passage's claim that
artificial wetlands are perfect method to sequester CO2.
Finally, the
professor argues that abandoning CO2 to unused coal mines has many problems.
When coal bonded CO2 burns, they release methane that contains carbon. Thus, the amount of CO2
in the atmosphere will not decline. Also,
attached CO2 to the surface of coal can leak out in the air. This counters the
reading passage's assertion that we can capture CO2 into coal mines for
hundreds of years.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩에 대한 부분을 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|