▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample
support for author's claim that scientists have figured out several reasons
that cause global warming. However, the professor in this lecture gives several
reasons as a rebuttal to author's point.
First, the professor argues that methane
gas which is created by landfill is not a significant factor. Methane accounts
not only less than 9% in greenhouse gas but also less than 1% in atmosphere.
This casts doubt on the reading passage's assertion that landfills' organic waste
produces methane and it causes warmer temperatures. causing warmer temperature.
Next, the professor insists that deforestation
does not match to carbon dioxide. When the trees died, they emit all the carbon
dioxide. Therefore, harvesting for making houses and furniture delays this
process. This counters the reading passage's suggestion that harvesting a lot of
trees make makes (ing뒤에는 항상 동사 원형입니다) a great amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, so temperatures increase increasing the temperature.
Lastly, the professor contends that global
warming is not related to cycle of climate change. In the medieval warm period, there
was not a global event, so the average temperature was not high. At that time,
the northern hemisphere had warm climate, but other areas had cooler
temperature. This refutes the reading passage's claim that ice core samples show
that there were periods of higher than usual temperatures in the medieval period.
In addition, many regions experienced long summers compared to winters.
점수: 27 지적살 부분이 없는 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 서로 구체적으로 자신의 주장을 잘 전달하고 있습니다. 구체적 설명들을 통하여서 서로의 견해가 무엇인지를 잘 파악할 수 있었습니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |