▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that their is evidence that relocating reptile in planned construction sites is not a viable conservation tool. On the other hand, the lecturer bring several points that contradict this argument. to contradict this argument. First, the lecturer points that moving reptiles to a new area cannot bring about overpopulation. It is true that planned construction sites can be occupied by similar species, but that cannot cause severe competition for food and living space because there will be many habitat. This refutes the author's point that moving reptiles to a new area can bring about overpopulation. Moreover, in the lecture, the point is made that relocation of reptiles cannot contribute to the spread of disease. even if reptile in the new area can be vulnerable to diseases, they will be controlled by experts who regularly will visit the new area. This casts doubts on the idea in the reading that relocation of reptiles can contribute to the spread of disease. The final point made by the lecturer is that reptiles may not be injured and killed while they are being captured. It is attributed to the fact that experts Experts (it is attributed to the fact는 적절한 표현이 아닙니다) predict when the animals remain trapped and recover them. In addition, because the reptiles hide in the bucket, they do not easy prey for predators. This is different from the passage's point that reptiles may be injured and killed while they are being captured.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩에 대한 정보를 한 단락에 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|