▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim that hammerhead shark’s head has evolutionary advantages. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s points. First, the professor contends that the structure of the head does not enhance visual ability. Rather, it is only possible when there are distant objects. And the hammerhead’s specific shape has drawback. Since it has blind spot, it has difficulty of identifying and catching prey. Therefore, the structure of head can be obstacle for hammershark. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that its vision is strenthened due to the unique structure of the head. Next, the professor insists that the hammerhead shark’s sense of smell is not better than other sharks. Regular sharks have good ability of smell just as well as hammerhead sharks. For instance, one shark the professor gives for an example can detect one spoil of blood in single Olympic pool. Also, there is no scientific study concerning about this. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that the shape of the shark’s head gives merit in better sense of smelling. Finally, the professor argues that head structure gives no advantage of spinning quickly. When scientists make videotape of its movement, the hammerhead shark does not use head for steering. Instead, it can turn swiftly because of the flexibility that its backbone has. This refutes the reading passage’s suggestion that the hammerhead’s head shape can make the animal turn fast
우선 fastly는 없는 단어입니다..fast라고 써주셔야 합니다. 몇몇 자잘한 문법 오류를 제외하면 전체적으로 잘 작성해주셨습니다 reading과 listening간의 내용도 좋습니다. 하지만 왜 그냥 professor라고만 하고 뒤에 설명이 없는건가요? reading professor, listening professor꼭 정확하게 명시해주셔야 전체적인 비교가 쉬워집니다 |