지역사회 봉사활동을 학교 과정에 넣어야 하는지에 대한 문제입니다.
감사합니다;)
In the given set of materials, the author and the lecturer state some discordant opinion over the issue of students doing community service. The author raises objections to add community service in school curricular. However, the lecturer dismisses the arguments presented in the passage with three cogent explanations.
To start with, the lecturer indicates dissent over the author’s idea on evaluation. The author points out that school officers are virtually not able to keep eyes on all student activities, which leads students to do community service simply for the beatification of their neighborhood. The lecturer, however, claims that it is not founded on a factual basis since many schools have their community service programs and evaluation criteria. To elaborate, the students’ community service is verified by community service agents who are responsible for monitoring students’ activities and grading their works.
On top of that, the lecturer disagrees with the author’s contention on community service as a mandatory curricular. The author insists that students might misunderstand the pursuits of community service if it is considered a form of compensation. The lecturer, in contrast, suggests that the community service encourages students to get inspired to help others. For example, a student who has enjoyed assisting children doing homework as a community service may become a teacher that an occupation of helping others.
Finally, the lecturer goes on to expound that the author’s last point on students’ rights is refutable. The author maintains that compulsory community service violates students’ rights to spend time free. The lecturer mentions that the community service should be regarded as an obligation duty of students. In detail, students are responsible for doing assignments or not being absent. In the same manner, the community service is just one thing that students have to do during their school life.
통합형 너무 잘 쓰셨습니다..
우선 어휘 선정 아주 탁월한 편입니다. discordant opinion이나 contention, pursuits 등등 문장에 잘
어울리는 어휘가 뭔지 잘 알고 쓰신 듯 하여 내용 전달 아주 좋습니다
다만 왜 lecturer라고만 하고 from reading?listening인지 설명이 없는 건가요?
설명 꼭 있어야, 해석이 쉬워집니다. 통합형이 두 주장을 compare하는 것이 point인 만큼, 둘 간의 구분 확실하게 지어주세요