▶ Your Answer :
In the reading, the author argues that wave-energy facilities will have three advantages by alternating fossil fuel facilities. However, the professor gives arguments as rebuttals. She claims that the view of the using wave-energy is optimistic and seems to be illusion. First of all, the professor contends that the wave-energy facilities are not reliable because it is kind of the new technology, which has some technical malfunction. She worried about the situation when the facilities could not function well due to the harshness of the environment. It casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that the character of the wave which is predictable and has a constant pattern would not guarantee the reliability of the facilities. Secondly, the professor claims that the wave-energy facilities will have a bad impact on the environment. She says that while the facilities generate the energy, the toxic chemicals, harmful for the environment natural, will be generated used for maintaining the some factors in the facilities. Therefore, the ocean have to be contaminated by the chemicals leaked through the facilities. It refutes the reading passage’s claim that wave-energy facilities has a benefit for the environment because it does not burn fossil sources and emits pollutants. Lastly, the professor points out that the scenery of the ocean would be destroyed by the wave-energy facilities which are floating floated in the ocean. She says that the facilities are brighter than the surface of the ocean, it can have an impact on the beauty of the ocean, and people would be able to be irritated to see the facilities floating in the ocean. It counters the reading passage’s claim that natural scenery will maintain the beauty with the small size of the floating facilities in the ocean.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 3 | 4
| 3 | 4 | Score | Fair 18-23 |
- 3인칭 단수의 어법변환 및 a/the 한정사 사용 역시 유의하여 주세요.
- 마지막 내용에서 bright color 부분에 대하여 조금 더 상세히 언급되어야 하는 것으로 알고 있습니다. 다시 스크립트를 확인하여 주세요. |
|