■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
▶ Topic : The derivation of the Etruscan civilization from Turkey |
|
|
▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that the Etruscan civilization stemmed from Turkish one. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point. First, the professor contends that the DNA research conducted in 2004 cannot be reliable evidence. According to the lecture, there are a tremendous array of cases in which DNA data cannot provide a clear basis, because they could have been damaged with the flow of time. Furthermore, there exist opportunities for the data to be adulterated due to continuous contacts between the remains and other people. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that DNA gathered from the remains in Etruscan gravesites could give evidence for the deep connection between the Etruscans and Turks. Next, the professor insists that the (올바른 관사) idea that the type of languages used by the Etruscans is similar to that of the ancient Turks cannot support the migration of them from Turkey. There can exist two languages which have the same sort of alphabet but contain no link between each other. In addition, only those who survived in northern (철자 오류) Italy could have used the similar kind of language family. This counters the reading passage's assertion that the study of Etruscan inscriptions and texts demonstrate that the alphabet utilized by the Etruscans originated from that of Turkish. Moreover, this analysis explain that what was used by the Etruscans is perfectly different from the Indo-European languages of which were fairly made use by adjacent countries. Finally, the professor argues that the funerary characteristics of both Etruscan and Turkish cultures do not lead to an idea that the Turkish civilization was the root of Etruscan one. Archaeological studies plainly show that cremation had been practiced for dozens of years before those from Turkey arrived at northern Italy. Thus, the Etruscans may have just succeeded the culture of cremation which remained in that region. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that no other civilizations but Etruscan one cremated human corpses at that time. |
1. introduction의 분량을 3문장
이상으로 늘려주세요. |
2. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는
되어야 합니다.
이는 리딩에 대한 디테일 부족으로 이어지며, 분량 부족, 추가 설명 실패 등으로 이어질 수 있으니
리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
3. 문법은 대체적으로 깔끔한 편입니다.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*