Acutal test 2
In the lecture, the speaker from the listening lecture contends that the theories suggested in the reading are groundless. This casts doubt on the reading's point that there are plausible theories to explain the cause of TLPs.
First, the speaker argues that it is a coincidence for the gas to make the phenomena. It is not surprising that anyone does not know how much the amount of gas is actually. This is in contradictory to the reading passage's insistence that the phenomena is being caused by clouds of lunar gas.
Second, the speaker maintains that they need a lot of dust for being able to see the phenomena visually. However, the clouds of dust are very little and it is hard for people to find it.
This is in direct opposition to the reading passage's assertion that TLPs are illuminated clouds of dust.
Last, the speaker mentions that data about solar radiation is insufficient for proving the phenomena. Until now, there is no correlation between TLPs and solar radiation. This rebuts the reading passage's claim that solar radiation is (주어 동사 불일치) causing TPLs.
-
1. introduction의 분량을 3문장 이상으로 늘려주세요.
2. 디테일이 굉장히 부족한 편입니다.
주어진 자료에서 최대한 많은 evidence를 뽑아서 상세하게 서술해주세요!