▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that signing bonuses are advantageous in solving a lot of problems related to education. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point. First, the professor contends that signing bonuses cannot help schools lure the best educators. This is because they are not a decisive factor which is considered when opting for where to work. According to a study, most teachers deem the conditions of a workplace to be more important than financial reward. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that signing bonuses can have students dwelling in low income areas get education of quality by attracting skilled teachers. Next, the professor argues that making amends for teachers' moving costs by assigning the bonuses is not an issue. Teachers usually accept to work in a place near to their home, so costs which are necessary to relocate their house are not required in this situation. Even though it is true that there are some instructors who move long distance to reach their workplace, these cases are an exception. This refutes the reading passage's assertion that signing bonuses are able to atone for fees which teachers have to pay to move from their present dwellings. Finally, the professor insists that signing bonuses cannot serve as a solution for decreasing teacher turnover. If instructors feel unsatisfactory, they can simply return the bonuses and get out of their workplace. Moreover, they can make use of new bonuses they get at their next workplace to repay the previous ones. This counters the reading passage's suggestion that educators have no choice but to remain in the school where they work for a long period of time to earn the bonuses, which is helpful for students to obtain better scholastic results. For the aforementioned grounds, the professor in the lecture maintains that signing bonuses are not a beneficial way to settle various issues relevant to education. |