■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer : The
reading passage and the lecture both contain the same contents, but their arguments
are different. First of all, the reading passage argues that Maria Vermmer, the
eldest daughter of the painter, (컴마 마무리 필요합니다) could be the model of this masterpiece 'Girl
with a Pearl Earring'. But the lecturer debunks the reading passage's claim.
Since the painter drew hundreds of paintings modeled random ordinary women he
met in the neighborhood, so there are little evidence that the painting was
modeled to his daughter. Next argument is about another candidate, Magdalena,
who was the only daughter of Vermeer's patron. The reading passage's argues (동사 형태) that since Magdalena and the painter's family maintain a close relationship,
she could be the model of the painting. The lecturer refutes the reading
passage's claim that regarding the conservative feature of the time when the
painter had lived, it is impossible that Magdalena could be the model. The
lecturer also noted that painting of a person that has high status such as
Magdalena should not only resemble herself but also contain pride of her social
class and draw as an upscale figure. Lastly, the reading passage mentions (시제: 현재 시제. mention 뒤에는 전치사 필요 없습니다) about the tronie theory as an evidence of the model of the painting. It says
that Vemeer was influenced by the Tronie genre, so he could have drawn (과거분사) the painting
of an (모음 앞 관사 a는 an으로 교체됩니다) imaginary (철자 오류) figure. The lecturer contrasts (주어 동사 불일치) the reading passage's claim that
the tronie genre does not (줄임말 사용을 지양해주세요.) match the style of Vemeer's pieces. |
1. 문단 사이사이마다 엔터키를 쳐주세요.
구조를 더 정확하게 잡아주세요.
|
2. 사소한 문법 오류가 잦은 편입니다. proof-reading을 꼼꼼하게 해주세요.