▶ Your Answer :
Opinions maybe
divided over whether it is more reliable for office workers to work a four-day
and accept less pay in order to do so. Although the reading passage agrees on the effectiveness of reducing working days to four days a week, the lecturer contradicts the reading's assertion for the
following reasons.
First of all, the
reading's argument is that many companies can get a lot of profits through this
policy because employees who work a four-day might not make many errors.
However, the lecturer claims that it never brings more benefits for companies
because they should spend their money for various sectors such as training
and medical care for workers. This is because if employees work only for four
days, companies should need other workers and they have to provide new
computers and new office spaces. It may cost a lot.
On top of that,
although the reading passage claims that the unemployment problems can be solved if workers go to office only four days. However, the speakers casts doubt on reading's
assertion. The speakers says that the companies might not hire new workers due
to high cost. Therefore, they start other options which requires original
employees to work over time. As a result, working four days of working per week makes workers unhappy.
Finally, the author argues
that the options of a four-day work days per week helps to increase a quality of life.
However, the professor in the lecture asserts that it even will decrease a
quality of life. Workers who work for four days cannot get benefits of
promotions because a lot of companies prefer five-day workers to four-day
workers. Finally, those who want to work a four-day cannot make their ability
about the career and lose their job.
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
ADDRESSING TOPIC
|
ORGANIZATION
|
PROGRESSION AND COHERENCE
|
LANGUAGE USE
|
GRAMMAR
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
각 카테고리별 SCORE: LIMITED / FAIR / GOOD
|
- working four days per week 을 다양한 단어/문장으로 표현해주세요. |