▶ Your Answer :
In the
reading passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim that Etruscans
came from Turkey. However, the lecturer in the lecture gives several reasons as
a rebuttal to the author’s point.
First, the
lecturer contends that a study that relies upon ancient DNA is hard to believe.
The DNA was from thousands of years ago, which means that it has almost
certainly degraded. Also, given that lots of people may have had contact with
the DNA, it has probably been contaminated. This casts doubt on reading
passage’s claim that DNA proves that Etruscans came from Turkey.
Next, the
lecturer claims that it is unproven that the Etruscan language is related to
Turkish language. The similarities between the alphabets do not mean Etruscan
is related to Turkish language. Actually, it could be the only language that
has survive from its language family. This counters reading passage’s claim
that the Etruscan language is the evidence that the Etruscans migrated from Turkey.
Finally, the
lecturer asserts that there is no reason to assume a connection between the
funerary practices of Etruscans and of ancient Turks. It has been found that
cremation was performed in northern Italy before the Etruscans lived. This
indicates that the Etruscans were successors to these traditions. This refutes
the reading passage’s claim that a link between Etruscans and ancient Turks is
proven by similar funerary methods.
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
ADDRESSING TOPIC
|
ORGANIZATION
|
PROGRESSION AND COHERENCE
|
LANGUAGE USE
|
GRAMMAR
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
FAIR
|
각 카테고리별 SCORE: LIMITED / FAIR / GOOD
|
- 관사 사용 및 대소문자 사용 주의해주세요.
|