▶ Your Answer :
Undoubtedly,
science fields play a significant role in people’s daily lives in many of the
places where they work or play. Some people think that government should aid
scientific research even if it does not have any practical purpose, while
others do not. Both sides may have their own reasons to support their views. In
my opinion, however, I support that the government should provide researchers
with a lot of supports even though it does not have any practical goals for the following reasons.
First
of all, if the government spends its funding less on scientific researches, it
can lead to citizens’ complaints. This is because a lot of people consider
science one of the most important fields for their own country. Government
money is composed of citizens’ taxes, which means that they should have a say
on how it is used. If people start to think that money is spent on less
important matters, they are likely to lose trust in the government. For
instance, in 2010, the American government announced that it would decrease its
funds on science studies and increase its usage on military services. Many people
around the country started to protest against this new policy, with activists
rallying in front of City Halls. They demonstrated to persuade the government
to reconsider the allocation of its funding on the ground that this policy is
not one of their priorities.
In
addition, when the government aids scientists with financial supports
regardless of that their research does not have practical purposes, it can
contribute to an increase in their overall performance in study. Being
supported by the government requires them to be diligent, passionate, and
self-disciplined. When these personal traits are enhanced, they are likely to
bring a better result in their researches. For example, Georgetown University
found a huge difference between two groups of young researchers. One group
consisted of those who were offered 10,000 dollars every year for their study
by the government, and the other group was made up of those who could not get
any funding from the government. The researchers found that the former was more
likely to have a higher level of performance in their research than the latter.
To be specific, the first group showed a longer attention span, a strong
passion in their tasks, and a better ability to delay their gratification. On
the other hand, the second group tended to get distracted easily,
procrastinate, and act on impulse. This implies that funding is the key to
improve study performance. Without it, it would be difficult for researchers to
get better results. All things
considered, it is my belief that my argument concerning this issue has been
effectively and precisely delivered with the reasons I have mentioned above.
Never should we forget that this topic may have a huge impact on our future. |