▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, the writer introduces some ways to
use coal without damaging (something) damage. On the other hand, the lecturer insists that there are
some drawbacks against alleged methods.
First, the lecturer argues that gasification transforms are
not a proper solution. To be specific, when coal is converted into a gas, it should (Put the "verb" in it) heat.
However, since the process needs to burning fossil fuels, so this produces a lot
of harmful emissions. In addition, removing impurities from the coal also
requires a huge amount of water. To eliminate pollutant in coal, other resources
should be wasted. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that by using
gasification transforms, a lot of pollution form coal can be prevented.
Second, the lecturer contends that extracting the pollutants
from coal out of the air is not a better option to prevent pollution. The
methods only sieve ash from coal. Carbon dioxide which harmfully affect the
environment cannot be removed. Even if certain ash is filtered, this is just a minor effect to the environment. This counters the reading passage's assertion
that a way to extract the pollutant will prevent from harming the environment by
coal.(what does it mean?)
Finally, the lecturer asserts that the fabric filter is not
effective because a lot of maintenance are required. The filter bags cannot be used for long period because of short life and weakness. A lot of energy is needed to
install the apparatus, which over weight their efficiency. This rebuffs the
reading passage's point that fabric filter will reduce damage coming from the
usage of coal.
채점기준표
|
Grammar
|
Contents
|
Example
|
Coherence
|
점수
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
Score
|
Fair 18-20
|
수동태와 plural 사용이 용이해 보이지 않습니다. verb가 빠진 문장도 보이네요. contents 역시 주장들은 포인트를 모두 언급하였으나 그에 따른 예시 문장들의 연관성이 다소 미흡해 보입니다.
|
|