The lecturer disagrees with the reading passage’s claim on controlling the population of cane toads by presenting three counterarguments.
First, the lecturer claims that erecting fences to stop the spread of cane toads would be impossible. This is because cane toads can easily spread through rivers and streams where fences cannot (띄어쓰기 없음) be disrupted to stop the flow of water. This counters the reading passage’s claim that building fences help prevent the spread of cane toads.
Second the lecturer claims that using untrained volunteers would be problematic. This is because they can not distinguish native toads with cane toads and this may reduce the harmless native population. This counters the reading passage’s claim that local volunteers can be used to catch cane toads.
Lastly, the lecturer asserts that using virus to reduce the cane toad population is controversial. This is because virus can spread to other regions and create an ecological disaster by disrupting the natural environment. This counters the reading passage’s claim that virus is effective in eradicating cane toads.
Writing 0-30 scale
Good (26-28)
전반적으로 두 passage의 내용을 잘 정리하고, lecture가 reading을 반박하는 논리를 잘 설명했습니다.
일부 문법 및 표현이 어색한 부분이 있어 본문에 수정했으니 참고하세요.
reading passage의 주장을 좀 더 설명해서 (구구절절 하지는 말고 필요한만큼만 하면 됩니다!) 그 디테일 속에서 listening passage의 반박을 제시하면 더욱 좋습니다.