In the given set of information, (띄어쓰기 오류) both the reading passage and the lecture deal with zebra's white and black stripes. The lecturer casts doubt on the author's assertion on three plausible reasons theories of its function, by presenting three compelling counterarguments.
First of all, according to the reading, stripes help zebra avoid predators by blending into grass. However, the lecturer refutes the passage by stating that the author's claim is disputable. To be specific, lions can see zebras well when they are close.
Next, the lecturer claims that avoid of biting insect can sufficiently validate why stripes useful for zebra. The next point of the reading passage is that stripes make zebras avoid biting insects. Regarding this point, the lecturer indicates argues that the idea is not convincing. This is because mosquitos rely on much on the sense of smell than see sight. Therefore, they also has an impact on zebra at night stripes do not help zebras avoid mosquitos.
Lastly, the speaker also disagrees with the reading's final point that stripes create wind currents that cool the zebra down. He argues that there are no other studies that show stripes cool the zebra down the cooling effect of stripes (show의 목적어로는 명사구가 나와야죠. show that stripes cool the zebra down이라고 쓸 수도 있지만, 바로 앞 문장에서 반복된 표현은 피하는 것이 좋습니다). Therefore, the theories from the reading passage all have drawbacks.
Writing 0-30 scale
Fair (23-25)
전반적으로 두 passage의 내용을 잘 정리하고, lecture가 reading을 반박하는 논리를 잘 설명했습니다.
다만 문법과 표현 면에서 부족하거나 어색한 부분이 많습니다.
명사의 단/복수에 주의하고, 단어의 품사에 주의해서 올바른 단어를 사용하세요. 그밖에 여러 표현이 어색해 본문에 수정했으니 참고하세요.