I agree with the statement that teacher’s performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers. (“두 가지 근거로 그 이유를 설명하겠다” 정도만 써줘도 본문으로 자연스럽게 이어질 수 있습니다.)
First, evaluation by students helps teachers to improve their work performance. Evaluation by students allows teachers to easily find easily their drawbacks in teaching than evaluation by teachers. Teachers are likely to develop their teaching ability by correcting their flaw. For example, when I was a high school students, it was difficult for me to understand the history course. Interest in history decreased over time, and I’d like to quit the studying I did not want to study anymore. Someday, there was a chance to evaluate the history course, and I honestly described the reason why I’d like I wanted to stop studying history course. Fortunately after this evaluation, history course teachers tried to make students understand history easily by showing various pictures, videos and explaining enigmatic terms easily. I attended the course actively and started having to have interest again. This example shows that evaluation by teachers can be a good chance for teachers to improve their teaching skills.
Second, the purpose of teacher’s performance is to teach the students. evaluation by students enables for teachers to assess consider actually whether the learning to be achieved really takes place or not. Real evaluation by students contributes to the improvement of student’s academic performance in the long run. For example, the according to a recent (2007년이면 recent와는 거리가 있음) study conducted by Harvard University in 2007, a huge difference was shown between the two groups of high school students. One consisted of students who attend took a survey which to evaluates the teachers, and the other was made up of those who did not attend a survey. Many Researchers found that the former is was likely to have a higher score on their SAT than the latter. The research reported that in particular, the first group showed effective communication with their teachers and higher concentration on their course. On the other hand, the second group is was likely to get distracted easily. This implies that evaluation by students plays an important role in learning.
All things considered, I agree with the statement for the reason I mentioned above.
(주장이 무엇인지? “consider”한 “all thing”이 무엇인지? 제대로 밝혀주세요. 지금 이 결론은 아무런 내용이 없습니다.)
Writing 0-30 scale
Fair (21-23)
서론과 결론이 너무 부실합니다.
주장을 뒷받침하기 위한 두 point를 잘 정하고 설명했습니다.
다만 문법과 표현 면에서 부족하거나 어색한 부분이 많습니다. 특히 동사의 활용형 및 시제를 정확히 사용하는데 주의하세요.