▶ Your Answer :
While the author of the reading passage
argues that there are three theories why Richard III, a king of England,
eliminated his nephews, the lecturer opposes the reading’s assertion with
counter views.
First of all, the professor maintains that
the claim about Richard the third who easily accessed his nephews as a
protector to kill them seems to be baseless since he did not have to slay. To
explain, they did not have a right to become a king because they were
illegitimate children. This calls into question the reading passage’s argument
that the king of England murdered his nephews without difficulty by taking advantage
of kinship.
Additionally, the speaker mentions that a
history play written by Shakespeare representing the execution of the crown
successors looks to be controversial because the drama was not an independent
work. To be more specific, the Tudor family supported his novels and took care
of his livelihood. However, Tudors hated Richard III, making the dramatic script
favorable to them. This contradicts the point of the reading that the medieval
act shows King Richard III took his nephews’ lives.
Finally, the presenter contends that the
opinion regarding skeleton evidences which are of the young heirs in the Tower
of London appears to be mistaken, owing to the fact that a lot of people died
in the structure at that time. Besides, the debater asserts that professional historians
cannot so much as figure out what genders of the skeletons were. This goes
against the idea presented in the article that the skeletal remains in the
fortress must be of the little princess who were assassinated by their uncle,
Richard the third. |