▶ Your Answer : Both the reading passage and the
lecture deal with brain scan lie detector. In the writing, there is ample
support for the author’s
claim. However, the professor in the listening gives several reasons as a
rebuttal against the author’s
point.
To begin with, the lecturer argues
that Brain scan lie detector is not better than the
former one. This is because when people want to conceal
informations <= Uncountable 명사입니다. such
as sensitive or embarrassing topic, the brain tend to use some part which is
same part as lying. Therefore, it is not give does
not give precise information. This casts
doubt on the reading passage’s
claim that new lie detector is more accurate than former one since it scan
subject’s
brain.
On top of that, the speaker maintains
that an objective manner of new lie
detector is plainly false. <= an objective manner 가 무엇인가요? 구체화 및 clarify 해주세요.This is because people tend to
use different function of brain slightly each other, so it does not have
primary criteria, and it cannot elicits outcomes consistently as well. As a result,
new machines
also need expert’s
analysis. This counters the author’s suggestion that brain scan machine interpret in an
objective manner since it scan actual image of the specific parts of the brain
that are involved in lying. <= Listening point 가 정리가 잘 안된 느낌이에요.
Lastly, the speaker contends
that it is easy for subjects to cheat even if brain lie scanner used. This is because when
people think complex topic, the brain becomes a active state, which is the same state when people lie. <= complex topic 과 cheat 의 관계 설명 해주세요. Moreover, if subject practice
untrue story in advance, it will turn out to be honest. This refutes the writer’s point that brain lie scanner
could make difficult to fool to subject.
Writing 0-30 Score
Scale
Limited (0-16)
Overall Comment: Listening
points 들이 unclear 합니다. 특히 Body 2 더 쉽게 정리정돈 해주세요. Body 3 에서도 설명이 부족했어요. Listening points 들을
나열하는 것이 아니라, 논리적으로 요약하고 어느정도 인과 관계 설명이 있어야합니다.
|