In the reading passage, the writer gives some reasons why congestion pricing is beneficial. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict these arguments. (congestion pricing이 뭔지 간략한 설명을 해주면 더 좋습니다. the writer gives some reasons why congestion pricing, which is ~~~, is beneficial.)
First, the lecturer argues that congestion pricing lead makes driving to be hazardous due to high speed. Even if the congestion pricing makes decreases the number of accidents decrease, the degree of them could be more severe. According to the Australian government, a 30 percent increase in speed doubles the danger of accidents. Thus, the collisions may even injured people severely to the death. This casts doubt on the reading passage that congestion pricing cause makes the driving environment to be more safe safer.
Second, the lecturer contends that public transportation system could be worsened considering long term period in the long run. If a city's public transit becomes convenient, people more make more use of the system. This increased usage will exceed their its capacity. Therefore, this makes it harder for people even to catch a bus as well as to be uncomfortable and the transportation will be more uncomfortable. This refutes the reading passage's assertion that people can will be able to use city's public transportation more conveniently with congestion pricing.
Finally, the lecturer insists that businesses would be negatively affected by the congestion system. Their revenue will reduce decrease because customers usually drive a cars to visit the stores. Most retails will blame the system. This system is not good for businesses to earn a profit. This counters the writer's point that businesses will be positively influenced by the congestion pricing.
Writing 0-30 scale
Fair (21-25)
명사의 단복수 및 관사(a/an/the/무관사)의 사용에 주의하세요. 마찬가지로 동사가 주어의 단/복수에 어울리게 쓰세요.
선택한 동사가 의도한 의미에 어울리지 않는 경우가 있습니다. 사전적 의미 뿐만 아니라 용례를 통해 뉘앙스를 잘 파악하세요.