▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim
that T-rex is scavenger, not a predator. However, the professor in the lecture
gives several rebuttals against the author’s point.
First, the professor contends that T-rex is predator which has dull
teeth, but it was for chewing meats. Also, the teeth have sharp appearance and
20centimeters long incisor to kill preys. Thus, T-rex ‘s teeth is very strong
weapon to attack a prey. This casts doubt on the reading passage claim that
T-rex has dull and wide teeth for crushing bones, which is characteristic of
scavenger. This is why the T-rex is scavenger.
Next, the professor insists that Predator needs a good sense of odor to
detect preys as well. The odor of predator can help locate and hunt preys. Also,
they can avoid with other predator by noticing the other predator’s territory
through their odor. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that T-rex’s
brain structure proves them as a scavenger. Because scavenger’s brain structure
was developed especially in part of odor.
Finally, the professor argues that the size of eyes could be no critical
reason for classifying between scavenger or predator. T-rex have forward-facing
eyes, binocular eyes. This means they can hunt preys with both eyes. It allows
the predator to measure accurate distance from prey. This refutes the reading
passage’s suggestion that T-rex’s small eyes have poor eye sight because
scavengers don’t need to hunt the distant prey. In contrary, large eyes have
good eye sight to see distant preys.
모범답안 보지않고 일단 써봤는데 몇점정도 받을 수 있을까요?ㅠㅠㅠ
|