▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage covers three major
points concerning the health issue of the sucralose intake. The listening
passage, however, clearly states that why these points are debatable.
The first point made by the author is that
sucralose increases the risk of developing diabetes because it increases
insulin. However, the speaker challenges by mentioning that sucralose is not
hazardous. Since this substance and insulin are also in rice and potatoes, it
is unlikely to cause the disease. Hence, diabetes may not be an effective
reason of the sucralose intake.
Another point made by the writer is that
sucralose makes harmful substances when it is used in a food preparation as
chloropropanols, are produced, which causing cancer. The lecturer asserts that
this is not true due to the fact that since lab tests revealed that harmful chemical
is not found in food we eat, so it is safe to use it for cooking. Also, the cooking temperature in cooking is not too high to produce chloropropanols. Thus, the
toxic chemical produced by cooking might not be a reason to support the entire
topic.
Lastly, the reading claims that the critical
allergic reactions are the reason of the sucralose intake and means that the body
is not capable of taking such substances. The professor further debunks this by
saying that the data used in the report is unreliable. Rather, a lot of tests
showed that sucralose is safe for human consumption, and no severe allergic
reaction is found compared to normal food. Therefore, allergic reaction is not
a viable reason.
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
ADDRESSING TOPIC
|
ORGANIZATION
|
PROGRESSION AND COHERENCE
|
LANGUAGE USE
|
GRAMMAR
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
FAIR
|
각 카테고리별 SCORE: LIMITED / FAIR / GOOD
|
- 문장 내 쉼표 사용에 주의해주세요.
|