▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage covers three major points concerning about
Chaco people and their significant facts. The listening passage also of discusses the same topic, and
certainly states why these points are debatable.
Firstly, the lecturer argues that
there were a lot of roads separated, so it was impossible that the roads were
built up to help Chaco people travel more
conveniently to public meetings. She also added that the reading’s concern
(what’s the concern?) is dubious and it has no
certain evidence.
This rebuffs to the
reading passage’s assertion that Chaco people were able to travel more easily
to meet people because of the roads that were created at that time. (순서를 바꿔주세요. Reading passage의 입장부터 명시해
주시고, 그 다음에 lecturer의 포인트를 적으시는 게
더 자연스러워요.)
Secondly, the speaker maintains
that it is unbelievable that there were four basic directions that symbolized
Chaco roads. This is because there were directions
representing Chaco roads everywhere, not just the four. The lecturer supports
her idea by saying that there is no clear proof that there were only four
directions to signify Chaco roads. This is in contradictory to the
reading’s statement that there were four primitive directions that represented
Chaco roads.
Lastly, the professor contends
that the roads were not intended to help Chaco Canyon as the cultural center. This is due to the fact that the culture for the previous
meaning was once stopped, so people began constructing the building again and
that was undone for a long while. 문법적인 오류가 있는 건 아니지만, 무슨
뜻인지 파악하기가 어렵습니다.) This contradicts the reading
passage’s claim that the roads may have been created to support Chaco Canyon as
Chaco civilization’s cultural center.
Writing
0-30 Score Scale |
Fair (17-23) |
Score |
20 |
Overall
Comment: |
Good try! 문법적인 오류가
많지는 않지만, 위에 지적을 해 드렸듯이 먼저 잘못된 reading passage의 입장들을 나열하신 다음에, author의 입장으로
반박하시는 게 더 옳은 순서입니다. |
|
|