▶ Your Answer :
While the author of the reading passage argues that there are three negative effects on introducing wolves into the wild, the lecturer opposes the reading’s assertion with counter views. First of all, the speaker contends that the claim relating to disrupting the balance of the ecosystem by slaughtering elks seems flawed, because there are the is a great number of the preys in the forest. To explain, He/she further explains that the *numerous herbivorous animals eat a large amount of grass which is food for other plant-eating ones including sheep. Thus, it is necessary for the predators to reduce the population of the elk. This contradicts the reading passage’s argument that reintroducing wolves would disorder the equilibrium of the food chain. *the numerous herbivorous animals가 elk의 대명사 개념으로 쓰인건가요? 만약에 그렇다면, the herbivorous animals, many of the herbivorous animals이런식으로 the 가 명사 바로 앞에 나오게끔 해주셔야 합니다. the numerous로 쓰시면 어느 특정한 그룹의 elk로 표현이 됩니다. Additionally, the professor mentions that the opinion about an adverse influence (influence of what? 새로운 문단의 topic sentence이므로 다시 제시해주셔야 합니다) on ranchers’ livelihood looks baseless, since the local government can subsidize shepherds when their livestock are killed by wolves. To be more specific, by compensating for the loss of the sheep, the government can minimize the damage of to the local economy. This casts doubt on the point of the reading that when the predatory beasts return to the environment, the economic situation of a local region will be severely harmed. the local region will be severely harmed in economic terms / the economy of the local region will be severely harmed Finally, the debater maintains that the suggestion concerning wolves’ attacks against humans appears exaggerated, owing to the fact the carnivores do not always try to assault them. In detail, a wolf howls loudly to warn people when they encroach its territory. This means that people can avoid a raid from of a pack of wolves, on the condition that they get out of the place immediately. In this regard, it is biased to say that the predatory animals are dangerous for people at all times. This goes against the idea presented in the article that the wolf wolves are is harmful to a human beings due to its their aggressive character as a fearful hunters. (이전 문장과 반복이니 둘 중 하나를 삭제해주세요)
Score: Limited (1-16), Fair (17-23), Good (24–30) Comments: - 강의와 리딩의 내용 요약이 매우 잘 되어있습니다. - 전치사/관사에 있어 자잘한 문법 실수들이 있습니다.
|