▶ Your Answer : According to the reading passage, there is
ample support for the author's claim that the cause of the fast disintegration
is clear. However, in the lecture, the professor's gives several reasons as a
rebuttal for the author's point.
First, the professor asserts that flood was common occurrence. Accordingly, the Hohokam people could
overcome natural disasters. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim
that the Hohokam society was relocated because of the flood.
Second, the professor contends that Spain did not arrive before the
Hohokam society had disappeared. Also, there are not any mass graves in this
area. This refutes the reading passage's claim that because of the epidemic,
the Hohokam society disappeared.
Third, the professor argues that we can not know whether there would be
a ruling class or not since we can not find any tombstones or dwellings in this
area. Moreover, oral histories of the Pima Indians are not reliable. This rebuts
the reading passage's claim that the Hohokam society collapsed because of the
revolution.
우선 내용이 너무 짧습니다. reading과 listening 간의 내용 balance가 맞아야하고 listening양이 절대적으로 많아야합니다. 그런데 paragraph길이자체도 너무 짧고 설명이 다 되지 않은 상태에서 문장들이 그냥 끝나는 듯한 기분입니다. 다음에 통합형 에세이를 쓸 때는 조금 더 길게, 자세하게 쓸 수 있도록 listening 주의깊게 듣는거 중요합니다 |