▶ Your Answer :
According to the reading part, the writer agrees that the research based on animals should be continued. On the other hand, the speaker disagrees with the idea the writer says, being against for a professor.
The author, who wrote the passage, thinks that to implement research on animals is inevitable. First of all, there is no replacement as good as animals to invent medicines for human. For example, the genes of chimpanzees are almost same as with us. Second, the results from that kind of research are very helpful to expect the one when it comes to human. There are many instances to prove it, such as research done by Louis Pasteur, a French scientist. For these reasons, the writer agrees that it is still inevitable and vital experiment for medicine.
However, the speaker in the lecture disagrees with the idea in the passage. As a person who has studied biology, she says that there are a lot of replacements instead of animals, like using a tissue and a computer graphic. In addition to it, she insists that animals are in a harsh environment under the name of the experiment. Finally, she mentioned that there are many examples to be invented without animals, such as Aspirin.
|